This blog compiles the thoughts of UCLA undergraduates on the connections between economic history and current events. All contributors to this blog are enrolled in Ec183, The Development of Economic Institutions in the United States. The premise of this course is the history matters. The careful application of economic theory and quantitative reasoning can help us understand the past.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Italy and Greece fire their heads
http://www.economynews.us/economy/italy-and-greece-lose-their-heads-markets-reward/
Price increases are not affecting Mcdonalds, Nike and Starbucks
http://news.yahoo.com/raise-price-theyll-still-come-144949482.html
Growth in GDP revised in the third quarter
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/22/news/economy/gdp_report/index.htm?iid=SF_E_River
Stronger Lure For Prospective Home Buyer
For more information:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203764804577060502694077494.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection
Rich and Poor Students Graduation Gap Increased
For more information:
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/21/news/economy/income_college/index.htm?iid=HP_MP_River
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
South Park
Source: http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s15e09-the-last-of-the-meheecans
Glass Ceiling for Women in Finance
http://www.fins.com/Finance/Articles/SBB0001424052970204443404577054143139934280/No-Big-Gains-for-Women-MDs-at-Goldman-Sach
New York: OKing Same-Sex Marraige or Not?
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-06-19/local/29696836_1_marriage-bill-gay-marriage-gay-couples
Rice: the impact of the Thai floods on the crop price
http://www.economist.com/node/21538099
UC occupy
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Consumption Trends of Today's Economy
New Facts on the Gender Gap From the World Bank
This article by Sudeep Reddy, posted online from the September 18, 2011 Wall Street Journal, highlights the World Bank’s most recent statistics on the gender gap, it includes data on wealth, wages, mortality and education. With the data presented in the article it can be observed that despite decades of progress women in developing countries still face large inequalities. The article indicates that these inequalities still exist because of a variety of barriers, which include poverty and ethnicity. The message of the article is that countries that create better opportunities for women can increase output per worker, which increases productivity. This article relates to today’s lecture on women’s participation in the labor force. Today’s lecture focused on women’s labor force participation trends, and what caused these trends to occur. In lecture the main cause of the quiet revolution was proven to be new contraceptive technology. In processing this information I began to ponder whether contraception technology could be classified as one of the barriers listed in the article. If so then efforts to distribute new contraception methods in developing worlds would not only reduce poverty (a listed barrier in the article) but would also help close the gender gap and would ultimately give women more incentive to pursue long term careers, which would increase the output per worker and the productivity of the developing countries economy. If my initial thoughts are correct. This would kill two birds with one stone. So why isn’t it happening?
If you want to see the statisitcs here is the web address: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/09/18/new-facts-on-the-gender-gap-from-the-world-bank/
Monday, November 21, 2011
Failed Debt Crisis Meeting
As New Graduates Return to Nest, Economy Also Feels the Pain
Historians have suggested that during the Great Depression the purchase of durable goods in the economy was delayed due to uncertainty about future unemployment and income. This created a positive feedback loop in the economy as less consumption led to the accumulation of inventory and further layoffs. A similar parallel can be drawn to the current economic state of the United States as more and more recent college graduates entering the workforce (or trying enter) are delaying the durable purchases of houses. The New York Times article (linked below) states that 14.2% of young adults are living with their parents, therefore creating shortage in consumption demand of houses, furniture, repair/maintenance services, internet, utilities and other purchases that are associated with renting an apartment or home ownership. Optimists believe that this “pent up” demand of consumption will be unleashed once job prospects increase and uncertainty decreases, creating a surge in housing demand. It will be interesting to see how long it takes for consumption to rebound.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/business/economy/as-graduates-move-back-home-economy-feels-the-pain.html?ref=education
Lessons from the Great Depression
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Occupy the Agenda
Nicholas Kristof goes beyond the violence that has come to characterize the Occupy Wall Street movement and delves into the root of the problem—economic inequality. He cites the statistic that 1% of Americans possess a greater net worth than the bottom 90%. In class, we discussed income mobility as a possible factor for the degree of welfare and redistribution in a country. Kristoff suggests that upward mobility in the United States is in fact more constrained that mobility in other industrialized nations; he instead suggests that varying educational opportunities and money used for political purposes are key drivers of inequality. His emphasis on money used in politics leads us to question the median voter model, as he claims that the rich have the most political influence.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/opinion/sunday/kristof-occupy-the-agenda.html?_r=1&hpw
The Magic of Diasporas
Amidst current anti immigration policies in the United States and United Kingdom the author of this article is arguing and evaluating the economic importance of immigration. The author argues that diasporas in the modern world are important to economic growth for a variety of reasons: spreading ideas, building networks between countries, allowing business flow and providing a channel for the spread of money between countries. Moreover, the author downplays the negative impacts of immigration, mainly “brain drain” and cost of welfare on the public purse, by arguing that immigrants who go abroad for education often return with capital and/or innovation and immigrants often claim less welfare than their indigenous counter parts. This article ties closely with our own discussion on the United State’s history of immigration and can be found at the link below:
http://www.economist.com/node/21538742